Personal life mission statement Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Personal life mission statement - Assignment Example The present paper is an attempt to produce a mission statement regarding my views and ambitions to be observed and carried out in my personal and professional life. The paper will also elaborate the social and moral values, my personal beliefs, social role and domestic obligations and responsibilities Part I Moral Values: Definitions Being the true follower of Christian faith, I strictly adhere to the code of moral ethics described in the Holy Bible. These moral principles include truth, justice, compassion, sacrifice, love, and humility. In addition, creating comforts for others and abstaining from harming and hurting the humans as well as other creatures come under the definition of adopting compassion and morality (Hollis 124–25). Truth Truth simply stands for depicting and adopting reality and actuality based on facts by presenting the exact scenario of a situation. While dwelling on the significance of truthfulness, it is evident that faith (New International Version, Lev . 19.11–14) and social values strictly lay stress upon providing a correct and accurate account of the events taking place within one’s natural, physical, and cultural environment. Abstaining from lies and exaggerations also falls within the definition of truth. Justice Justice refers to implication of impartiality and righteousness while reaching a conclusion or making a decision; similarly, dealing with others on the principles of equality and fair play without applying bias or prejudice may as well be referred to as justice. Individual Autonomy Individual autonomy simply means having personal freedom and liberty of expression and movement. In other words, individual autonomy seeks to allow people to exercise their abilities and get involved in activities of their choice provided the activities are not detrimental or harmful to others. Part II I strictly believe in speaking the truth and producing the exact scenario of a situation without having any fears with regard to the consequences. I unconditionally argue in support of preserving honesty and ingenuousness in one’s personal and professional life instead of concealing the truth under the pile of deceit. Sometimes, one has to pay a ransom amount for observing integrity, honesty and straightforwardness; somehow, I am determined to reveal the truth whenever I obtain an opportunity of exercising the same, even if it hurts someone very close to me. I would be open in my personal and professional relationships, and would never deceive my family, friends, associates or other members of society by shaking their trust they have developed in my personality. Identical with truthfulness, justice also enjoys a respectable position in my heart and mind. Being a rational, well-groomed, highly-educated and socialized person, I aim to treat all humans on the foundations of equality and fairness. Hence, instead of demonstrating any ethno-racial, regional, religious, gender-based or other prejudice, I am determined to make my decisions without having bias, grudge or the background of people, while living and working in a multinational and multicultural environment. I personally believe in granting of the freedom of thought and action; nevertheless, I would not allow others to practice the things that are in sharp contrast to the social norms and religious, moral and ethical values. Consequently, I will not support prostitution, gambling, extra-marital cohabitation and other immoralities being witnessed by people in the name of freedom and individual autonomy. Not only will I never observe injustice of any kind, I also am resolute to resist and discourage such actions. Consequently, I will attempt to add my share in the construction of a balanced and just atmosphere all around me. Part III Social Roles It is a reality beyond suspicion that social norms, moral values,

Land Law Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Land Law - Essay Example It can be seen that Piers’ behaviour is lawful given that he lawfully entered into a contract with Rupert where an agreement of sale of the house was reached between the two. A contract can be loosely described as a legally binding agreement between two parties (Gibson, 1988). Certain elements need to exist in the formation of a contract. In order for a contract to be legally binding, there should be an agreement between the two parties involved. According to Harvey v Facey [1893] AC552, every contract should consist of an offer made by one party and accepted by the other. If it involves buying and selling, the seller agrees to sell something and the buyer agrees to pay for the goods or products being sold. Thus, sale of goods or property is regarded as a legally binding contract. After buying the Sun House, Piers became the legal owner of the place and is entitled to full control of it hence his behaviour is legal when he makes the changes described above. This agreement of s ale is silent about the existence of a tenant, Heather who has a legal two year contract of renting the place. However, this agreement was made between her and Rupert, the previous owner. In actual fact, it is Rupert who was supposed to redefine Heather’s contract since he was selling the property to another new owner. Rupert could also have raised the issue with the new owner of the place if he was willing to accommodate this sitting tenant at the premises. However, this is not the case so Piers has the right to enjoy freedom at his newly acquired property. Indeed, this action can affect Heather who is unaware of what is happening but it is advisable to Piers that his behaviour is legal. On the agreement of sale of the house it is not stated that there is a tenant living there so there is no way Piers can be sued for something which he is not part of. By virtue of ordering Charlotte not to use his front drive, it is also advisable that his behaviour is within the legal confi nes of the law. The law of the land states that every person has a right to ownership to property and owners are protected by the laws of trespass to land. This can be supported by the case of Winder v. DPP [1996] 160 J.P.R 713, where the defendants were charged and convicted of aggravated trespass for intentionally disturbing a fox hunt on private property. As the new owner of the Sun House, Piers has a right to enjoy freedom without interference by trespassers hence his behaviour can be said to be lawful. Charlotte has to abide by the rules of the new owner of the place and she has to find another alternative route. In case of Jude who contributed 33% when the Sun House was initially purchased, it can be noted that Piers also has the right to tell him to leave. In the agreement of sale of the house, it was clearly spelled that Rupert was the sole owner of the place. In fact, it is Rupert who misrepresented the facts so this may not be a problem of the new owner of the house who bo ught it in faith on the basis of information he obtained from the seller when they entered into this particular agreement. A critical analysis of this case shows that Piers’ behaviour is lawful though it has a negative impact on the other parties affected as discussed above. 2. When Kevin the property developer finished renovating the previously dilapidated houses he bought, he